Bit gold
A long time ago I hit upon the idea of bit gold. The problem, in a nutshell, is that our money currently depends on trust in a third party for its value. As many inflationary and hyperinflationary episodes during the 20th century demonstrated, this is not an ideal state of affairs. Similarly, private bank note issue, while it had various advantages as well as disadvantages, similarly depended on a trusted third party.
Precious metals and collectibles have an unforgeable scarcity due to the costliness of their creation. This once provided money the value of which was largely independent of any trusted third party. Precious metals have problems, however. It's too costly to assay metals repeatedly for common transactions. Thus a trusted third party (usually associated with a tax collector who accepted the coins as payment) was invoked to stamp a standard amount of the metal into a coin. Transporting large values of metal can be a rather insecure affair, as the British found when transporting gold across a U-boat infested Atlantic to Canada during World War I to support their gold standard. What's worse, you can't pay online with metal.
Thus, it would be very nice if there were a protocol whereby unforgeably costly bits could be created online with minimal dependence on trusted third parties, and then securely stored, transferred, and assayed with similar minimal trust. Bit gold.
My proposal for bit gold is based on computing a string of bits from a string of challenge bits, using functions called variously "client puzzle function," "proof of work function," or "secure benchmark function.". The resulting string of bits is the proof of work. Where a one-way function is prohibitively difficult to compute backwards, a secure benchmark function ideally comes with a specific cost, measured in compute cycles, to compute backwards.
Here are the main steps of the bit gold system that I envision:
(1) A public string of bits, the "challenge string," is created (see step 5).
(2) Alice on her computer generates the proof of work string from the challenge bits using a benchmark function.
(3) The proof of work is securely timestamped. This should work in a distributed fashion, with several different timestamp services so that no particular timestamp service need be substantially relied on.
(4) Alice adds the challenge string and the timestamped proof of work string to a distributed property title registryfor bit gold. Here, too, no single server is substantially relied on to properly operate the registry.
(5) The last-created string of bit gold provides the challenge bits for the next-created string.
(6) To verify that Alice is the owner of a particular string of bit gold, Bob checks the unforgeable chain of title in the bit gold title registry.
(7) To assay the value of a string of bit gold, Bob checks and verifies the challenge bits, the proof of work string, and the timestamp.
Note that Alice's control over her bit gold does not depend on her sole possession of the bits, but rather on her lead position in the unforgeable chain of title (chain of digital signatures) in the title registry.
All of this can be automated by software. The main limits to the security of the scheme are how well trust can be distributed in steps (3) and (4), and the problem of machine architecture which will be discussed below.
Hal Finney has implemented a variant of bit gold called RPOW (Reusable Proofs of Work). This relies on publishing the computer code for the "mint," which runs on a remote tamper-evident computer. The purchaser of of bit gold can then use remote attestation, which Finney calls the transparent server technique, to verify that a particular number of cycles were actually performed.
The main problem with all these schemes is that proof of work schemes depend on computer architecture, not just an abstract mathematics based on an abstract "compute cycle." (I wrote about this obscurely several years ago.) Thus, it might be possible to be a very low cost producer (by several orders of magnitude) and swamp the market with bit gold. However, since bit gold is timestamped, the time created as well as the mathematical difficulty of the work can be automatically proven. From this, it can usually be inferred what the cost of producing during that time period was.
Unlike fungible atoms of gold, but as with collector's items, a large supply during a given time period will drive down the value of those particular items. In this respect "bit gold" acts more like collector's items than like gold. However, the match between this ex post market and the auction determining the initial value might create a very substantial profit for the "bit gold miner" who invents and deploys an optimized computer architecture.
Thus, bit gold will not be fungible based on a simple function of, for example, the length of the string. Instead, to create fungible units dealers will have to combine different-valued pieces of bit gold into larger units of approximately equal value. This is analogous to what many commodity dealers do today to make commodity markets possible. Trust is still distributed because the estimated values of such bundles can be independently verified by many other parties in a largely or entirely automated fashion.
In summary, all money mankind has ever used has been insecure in one way or another. This insecurity has been manifested in a wide variety of ways, from counterfeiting to theft, but the most pernicious of which has probably been inflation. Bit gold may provide us with a money of unprecedented security from these dangers. The potential for initially hidden supply gluts due to hidden innovations in machine architecture is a potential flaw in bit gold, or at least an imperfection which the initial auctions and ex post exchanges of bit gold will have to address.
amazon bitcoin Actually it’s a little more than that. Some blocks are mined a little late and don’t form part of the main blockchain. In Bitcoin these are called ‘orphans’ and are entirely discarded, but in Ethereum they are called ‘uncles’ and can be referenced by later blocks. If uncles are referenced as uncles by a later block, they create about 4.375 ETH for the miner of the uncle (7/8th of the full 5 ETH reward). This is called the uncle reward. Currently around 500 uncles are created per day, adding an additional 2,000 ETH into circulation per day (-0.7m ETH per year at this rate).In his original white paper, Nakamoto does not cite this literature or use its language. He uses some concepts, referring to his protocol as a consensus mechanism and considering faults both in the form of attackers, as well as nodes joining and leaving the network. This is in contrast to his explicit reliance on the literature in linked time-stamping (and proof of work, as we will discuss). When asked in a mailing-list discussion about bitcoin's relation to the Byzantine Generals' Problem (a thought experiment requiring BFT to solve), Nakamoto asserts the proof-of-work chain solves this problem.35waves bitcoin tether wallet donate bitcoin preev bitcoin car bitcoin
siiz bitcoin
exmo bitcoin bitcoin electrum bitcoin расчет криптовалюта tether blocks bitcoin withdraw bitcoin
ethereum пулы bitcoin cli bitcoin japan wifi tether bitcoin игры
bitcoin protocol
блок bitcoin a way to initially distribute coins into circulation, since there is no central authority to issue them.space bitcoin super bitcoin monero форум platinum bitcoin
краны ethereum bitcoin магазин joker bitcoin tracker bitcoin bitcoin etherium bitcoin fire bitcoin миллионеры micro bitcoin bitcointalk ethereum bitcoin nodes расчет bitcoin bitcoin протокол
bitcoin hesaplama видеокарты ethereum bitcoin генератор часы bitcoin покупка bitcoin pool monero best cryptocurrency bitcoin pizza bitcoin чат monero новости
bitcoin исходники bitcoin cnbc bitcoin android bitcoin сети bitcoin кошелек bitcoin компания
bitcoin cost ethereum пул партнерка bitcoin продать ethereum
***** of Bitcoinsbitcoin greenaddress Group identity develops amongst professional technologists (1980-2000)bitcoin конец ethereum torrent bitcoin hosting bitcoin майнеры сделки bitcoin bitcoin future bio bitcoin While both the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks are powered by the principle of distributed ledgers and cryptography, the two differ technically in many ways. For example, transactions on the Ethereum network may contain executable code, while data affixed to Bitcoin network transactions are generally only for keeping notes. Other differences include block time (an ether transaction is confirmed in seconds compared to minutes for bitcoin) and the algorithms that they run on (Ethereum uses ethash while Bitcoin uses SHA-256). bitcoin win blockchain ethereum download bitcoin скрипты bitcoin
tx bitcoin bitcoin buy bitcoin суть bitcoin green 2016 bitcoin cold bitcoin bitcoin code bitcoin capitalization ethereum эфир
bitcoin tor safe bitcoin boom bitcoin ethereum стоимость монет bitcoin ethereum windows bitcoin skrill minergate bitcoin bitcoin generator регистрация bitcoin
ethereum linux bitcoin оплатить основатель bitcoin bitcoin department monero обмен
monero proxy bitcoin сайты bag bitcoin claymore monero bitcoin продать 10 bitcoin bitcoin mt4 global bitcoin king bitcoin bitcoin security payoneer bitcoin jaxx monero check bitcoin monero вывод bitcoin график win bitcoin bitcoin china maining bitcoin bitcoin cranes new cryptocurrency bitcoin сша
bitcoin btc обвал ethereum ethereum project bitcoin skrill wallet tether multiply bitcoin bitcoin pattern протокол bitcoin supernova ethereum When it went live in 2009, Bitcoin was worth zero dollars and zero cents. In April 2011, you could get 1 Bitcoin for $1. On December 17, 2017, Bitcoin had its best day so far. You could trade 1BTC for $20,052! Today, on August 7, 2021, you can trade 1BTC for $11,822. Not bad, right?polkadot store wikileaks bitcoin monero алгоритм алгоритм monero калькулятор monero
tether tools abc bitcoin деньги bitcoin bitcoin суть autobot bitcoin ферма bitcoin иконка bitcoin bitcoin knots x bitcoin bitcoin weekly price bitcoin metatrader bitcoin обменять bitcoin monero xeon bitcoin media ethereum stats bitcoin государство bitcoin xyz bitcoin информация difficulty monero parity ethereum график bitcoin
ethereum contracts moneybox bitcoin история ethereum 2016 bitcoin
bitcoin transaction lavkalavka bitcoin bitcoin рублях bitcoin passphrase краны ethereum payable ethereum etf bitcoin bitcoin instant cranes bitcoin bitcoin ether bitcoin расчет bitcoin service bitcoin генератор ethereum бесплатно cz bitcoin bitcoin пул bitcoin тинькофф tether комиссии genesis bitcoin bitcoin conveyor
криптовалюта tether переводчик bitcoin основатель ethereum bitcoin аккаунт картинки bitcoin ninjatrader bitcoin
all cryptocurrency pay bitcoin
avto bitcoin bitcoin video bitcoin allstars bus bitcoin bitcoin webmoney bitcoin c система bitcoin кран ethereum claim bitcoin ethereum wallet криптовалют ethereum
ethereum blockchain bitcoin php api bitcoin bitcoin blue bitcoin коллектор
accept bitcoin bitcoin microsoft автомат bitcoin wmx bitcoin bitcoin ocean
bitcoin зарегистрироваться bitcoin registration
server bitcoin сети bitcoin bitcoin проблемы
алгоритмы ethereum ethereum статистика баланс bitcoin ethereum serpent car bitcoin стратегия bitcoin сложность ethereum flypool monero cryptocurrency forum bitcoin instagram monero nicehash wirex bitcoin msigna bitcoin bitcoin 99 asics bitcoin bitcoin kaufen trade cryptocurrency multisig bitcoin bitcoin preev bitcoin 999 карты bitcoin деньги bitcoin bitcoin блок bitcoin landing cryptocurrency market bitcoin block bounty bitcoin bitcoin зебра wirex bitcoin проекты bitcoin mine ethereum bitcoin переводчик bitcoin xyz bitcoin department On 18 March 2013, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (or FinCEN), a bureau of the United States Department of the Treasury, issued a report regarding centralized and decentralized 'virtual currencies' and their legal status within 'money services business' (MSB) and Bank Secrecy Act regulations. It classified digital currencies and other digital payment systems such as bitcoin as 'virtual currencies' because they are not legal tender under any sovereign jurisdiction. FinCEN cleared American users of bitcoin of legal obligations by saying, 'A user of virtual currency is not an MSB under FinCEN's regulations and therefore is not subject to MSB registration, reporting, and recordkeeping regulations.' However, it held that American entities who generate 'virtual currency' such as bitcoins are money transmitters or MSBs if they sell their generated currency for national currency: '...a person that creates units of convertible virtual currency and sells those units to another person for real currency or its equivalent is engaged in transmission to another location and is a money transmitter.' This specifically extends to 'miners' of the bitcoin currency who may have to register as MSBs and abide by the legal requirements of being a money transmitter if they sell their generated bitcoins for national currency and are within the United States. Since FinCEN issued this guidance, dozens of virtual currency exchangers and administrators have registered with FinCEN, and FinCEN is receiving an increasing number of suspicious activity reports (SARs) from these entities.However, they believe their platform could provide a means to make cryptocurrency more useful as a payment method. conference bitcoin bitcoin net таблица bitcoin ethereum shares
bitcoin png ethereum calc дешевеет bitcoin bitcoin poker red bitcoin bitcoin yen monero fork bitcoin reddit bitcoin usa bitcoin paypal coingecko ethereum usdt tether казино ethereum in bitcoin
difficulty bitcoin
верификация tether bitcoin xyz
6000 bitcoin форки ethereum kinolix bitcoin tether bootstrap nanopool monero bitcoin scam tether пополнение air bitcoin yota tether
make bitcoin cryptocurrency tech bitcoin транзакция best cryptocurrency ethereum падает bitcoin capital bitcoin 2048 Unlike informal governance systems, which use a combination of offline coordination and online code modifications to effect changes, on-chain governance systems solely work online. Changes to a blockchain are proposed through code updates. Subsequently, nodes can vote to accept or decline the change. Not all nodes have equal voting power. Nodes with greater holdings of coins have more votes as compared to nodes that have a relatively lesser number of holdings.ethereum рубль конференция bitcoin casper ethereum platinum bitcoin neo bitcoin bitcoin de enterprise ethereum bitcoin it gif bitcoin loans bitcoin алгоритм bitcoin bitcoin steam bitcoin инструкция machine bitcoin покер bitcoin mine monero ethereum blockchain bitcoin 10 currency bitcoin ethereum charts bitcoin мастернода пожертвование bitcoin qiwi bitcoin
fasterclick bitcoin ethereum прогнозы bank bitcoin
хардфорк monero ethereum вывод конец bitcoin
продажа bitcoin bitcoin инструкция rigname ethereum форумы bitcoin
metatrader bitcoin payoneer bitcoin bitcoin stiller кредит bitcoin часы bitcoin криптовалюта monero технология bitcoin рубли bitcoin bitcoin технология monero fr cryptocurrency market purchase bitcoin usb bitcoin bitcoin fake stellar cryptocurrency bitcoin habrahabr unconfirmed bitcoin теханализ bitcoin bitcoin виджет bitcoin up pay bitcoin bitcoin зебра bitcoin conf е bitcoin технология bitcoin бумажник bitcoin ethereum токен bitcoin тинькофф ethereum сбербанк kraken bitcoin ethereum php monero cryptonight fpga ethereum bitcoin parser ethereum api ethereum обменять nanopool ethereum bitcoin co ropsten ethereum продать ethereum bio bitcoin How Do I Start Mining Bitcoins?It is not owned by a single entity, hence it is decentralizedGenesis Mining Review: Genesis Mining offers Litecoin cloud mining contracts.lazy bitcoin алгоритм bitcoin bitcoin brokers кости bitcoin tether пополнение pool bitcoin bitcoin гарант tera bitcoin статистика ethereum вход bitcoin bitcoin purchase bitcoin datadir bitcoin exchange faucet bitcoin clockworkmod tether ethereum кошельки bitcoin datadir bitcoin автосерфинг bitcoin комиссия
